Chair of the UK Torture Prevention Body Calls For Stronger Government Focus on Eradicating Ill-treatment of Detainees

Screen Shot 2018-02-21 at 15.28.3320th February 2018

Following publication of the 8th Annual Report of the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM), its Chair today urged the UK Government to focus on the prevention of ill treatment in detention by guaranteeing the independence and resources of the NPM.

The NPM was established in 2009 by the UK Government to meet its UN treaty obligations under the United Nations’ Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture (OPCAT). The NPM’s 21 independent bodies have powers to inspect or monitor all places of detention across the UK including prisons, police custody, immigration centres, secure settings for children and young adults and mental health settings. Through regular, independent monitoring of places of detention – conducted through thousands of visits every year – the NPM plays a key role in preventing ill-treatment in detention.

The Annual Report gives an overview of NPM members’ extensive work monitoring detention across the whole of the UK. Read alongside the body’s recently published figures on the large numbers of people who are detained across the UK (more than 110,000 on 31 March 2017), it underlines the scale of the task for members of the NPM in checking how people are being treated. A copy of the Annual Report can be found on the NPM website: http://www.nationalpreventivemechanism.org.uk

 

John Wadham, Chair of the NPM, said:

“The UK’s NPM has a unique tradition of professional inspectors and members of the community visiting places of detention and their role is an important check on what goes on behind bars and closed doors.

When people are detained the risk of ill-treatment is, unfortunately, always present and, as highlighted in recent inspection and monitoring reports from members of the NPM, they often experience very poor conditions in detention.

OPCAT provides us with a crucial framework to strengthen our work monitoring places of detention, and it encourages us to focus even more carefully on preventing ill-treatment in practice. It is essential that the NPM and our members are given the necessary tools and resources to perform our vital work effectively.

Next year we need to strengthen both the NPM and its members. A key challenge for the NPM is our informal status, lack of legislation and guarantees of independence and, finally, the inadequate nature of the resources available centrally. We are one of the very few NPMs anywhere in the world operating without legislation providing a secure basis for our work. This must change and we will continue to work with the UK Government to ensure this happens.”

Read the Report here

Notes to Editors:

  1. The NPM’s Eighth Annual Report gives an overview of its work monitoring detention across the UK from 1 April 2016 to 31 March 2017. The report also details the NPM’s thematic work on transitions and pathways between different forms of custodial settings and the body’s recommendations for future action to ensure effective scrutiny across different organisational boundaries and improve the treatment of detainees. A copy of the Annual Report can be found on the NPM website: http://www.nationalpreventivemechanism.org.uk
  2. The NPM Annual Report was laid before Parliament by the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice with an accompanying Written Ministerial Statement: http://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/written-questions-answers-statements/written-statement/Commons/2018-02-20/HCWS469/
  3. The NPM was established in March 2009 under the Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (OPCAT). A United Nations treaty, OPCAT was ratified by the UK in 2003. OPCAT requires the UK to have in place a ‘national preventive mechanism’ to visit all places of detention and monitor the treatment of and conditions for detainees.
  4. In its 14th Report of 2016-17 “Part 1 of the Prisons and Courts Bill”, the Justice Select Committee recommended the UK Government “place the NPM on a definitive statutory basis, in accordance with the UK’s international obligations.” (paragraph 36)
  5. The NPM consists of 21 independent bodies throughout the UK, which have powers to regularly inspect or monitor places of detention and share the aim of preventing ill-treatment of anyone deprived of their liberty. It is coordinated by HM Inspectorate of Prisons.
  6. The 21 bodies who make up the NPM are:
    England and Wales

Care Inspectorate Wales

Care Quality Commission

The Children’s Commissioner for England
Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Prisons
Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services
Healthcare Inspectorate Wales
Independent Monitoring Boards
Independent Custody Visiting Association

Lay Observers

Ofsted (Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Service and Skills)

Northern Ireland

Criminal Justice Inspection Northern Ireland

Independent Monitoring Boards (Northern Ireland)

Northern Ireland Policing Board Independent Custody Visiting Scheme

The Regulation and Quality Improvement Authority

Scotland
      Care Inspectorate

      Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary in Scotland

Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Prisons for Scotland

Independent Custody Visitors Scotland
Mental Welfare Commission for Scotland

Scottish Human Rights Commission

United Kingdom

Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation

  1. The NPM’s Detention Population Data Mapping Project 2016-17 was published on 24th January 2018 and can be found on the NPM website: http://www.nationalpreventivemechanism.org.uk.
  2. The NPM found that more than 110,490 people were detained on 31 March 2017 across: adult prisons and secure settings for children and young adults in the four jurisdictions of the UK; residential immigration detention in the UK; and, mental health settings in England and Wales. Due to variations in the data sets and the way information is collected and recorded across settings and jurisdictions, the actual figure of people detained across all settings and jurisdictions will be much higher. The 110,490 figure does not include: detention in police custody; non-residential immigration detention; military or service detention; customs detention; or those detained under deprivation of library safeguards across all four jurisdictions. It also does not include those detained under mental health legislation in Scotland and Northern Ireland. The numbers of people detained on 31 March 2017 do not include those in police custody (because of difficulties sourcing the data). However, the NPM research did find that between 1 April 2016 to 31 March 2017 there were at least 840,607 detention events in police custody across the UK.
  3. Please contact John Steele in HMI Prisons press office on 020 33340357or 07880 787452 if you would like more information.

HMP Parc Young Persons’ Unit – Chief Inspector welcomes work to reverse recent deterioration in standards

The Young Persons’ Unit at HMP & YOI Parc near Bridgend in South Wales has shown “quite significant improvement’ in key aspects, including safety, in the past year, inspectors found. Peter Clarke, HM Chief Inspector of Prisons, said Parc had often received positive inspection results and he welcomed work by the management to turn around… Continue Reading

HMP Usk and HMP & YOI Prescoed – “Still fundamentally successful prisons”

HMP Usk, a small jail specialising in sex offender programmes, and the nearby HMP and YOI Prescoed, an open prison, remained “fundamentally successful” establishments, inspectors found in 2017. The two prisons in south east Wales are distinct establishments three-and-a-half miles apart, but run by the same management team. Usk is a small category C training… Continue Reading

HMP SUDBURY – “We Dont Talk To The Public”

WARNING THE PICTURES LINKED BELOW SHOW GRAPHIC KNIFE INJURIES. By Mark Leech, editor: The Prisons Handbook for England and Wales. The Governor of Sudbury Open Prison refuses to speak with members of the public in general  and the victims of violent crimes in particular whose assailants are locked up in his prison. In May 2014… Continue Reading

“Once again, we found CRCs stretched beyond their capacity”

Inspectors found that staff in Community Rehabilitation Companies (CRCs) did not see offenders often enough while under supervision on two of the most commonly used non-custodial sentences – community orders and suspended sentence orders. This lack of meaningful engagement led to poor decisions in managing breaches of the orders. Though the proportion of community-sentences completed… Continue Reading

Worboys Judicial Review Latest – Court ‘minded to grant permission’

Black-cab rapist John Worboys is appearing in person at the High Court to hear whether the decision to release him will face a legal challenge. He appeared in the dock of Court 5 at the Royal Courts of Justice on Wednesday, after Sir Brian Leveson asked for him to be brought from prison. The judge,… Continue Reading

Inspectorate warns of links to organised crime at Lindholme

Inmates with gang connections are determined to carry on “plying their trade” behind bars, a watchdog has warned. HM Inspectorate of Prisons (HMIP) flagged up the impact of holding hundreds of men with links to organised crime in the same establishment. An inspection report found drugs and violence were rife at HMP Lindholme in South Yorkshire.… Continue Reading

PAROLE BOARD: Review ‘A Priority’ After Worboys Case Says New Justice Secretary

The Parole Board followed “the correct procedures” when informing the victims of “black cab rapist” John Worboys of his release. However, Justice Secretary David Gauke told MPs the fact that some of the women learned of the decision from the media meant there was a need to review procedures. Mr Gauke, speaking in the Commons,… Continue Reading

HMYOI Cookham Wood: Violence and self-harm have increased at a youth jail

In the year since the last inspection of HMYOI Cookham Wood in September 2016, when a total of 54 recommendations were made (below), 16 had been implemented by the time of this inspection. An Implementation rate of 30%. Safety: 15 recommendations made, 7 implemented. Respect: 20 recommendations made, 4 implemented. Purposeful Activity: 8 recommendations made, 2 implemented.… Continue Reading

css.php