Category Archives: Human Rights

ECHR Rules Terrorism justifies closed courts

courtclosedEuropean Court of Human Rights

Published: January 15, 2016

Sher and Others v United Kingdom (Application No 5201/11)

Before G. Raimondi, President and Judges P. Hirvelä, L, Bianku, N. Tsotsoria, P. Mahoney, F. Vehabović and Y. Grozev

Section Registrar: F. Elens-Passos

Judgment: October 20, 2015

The right of suspected terrorists to take proceedings to challenge the lawfulness of their detention did not preclude the use of closed court hearings, at which neither the detainee nor his lawyer was present, for the submission of confidential information supporting the authorities’ line of investigation.

The European Court of Human Rights (Judge Vehabović dissenting) so held, inter alia, in determining that there had been no violation of the right of the applicants, Sultan Sher, Mohammed Rizwan Sharif and Mohammed Umer Farooq, to take proceedings to challenge the lawfulness of their detention, as guaranteed by article 5.4 of the European Convention on Human Rights, at hearings for warrants of further detention on expiry of the initial 48 hours permitted under the Terrorism Act 2000 following their arrest as part of a counterterrorism operation. The applicants were detained for a total of 13 days before being released without charge.

THE COURT said that the threat of an imminent terrorist attack had justified restrictions on the applicants’ article 5.4 rights. Terrorism fell into a special category.

Article 5.4 could not preclude the use of a closed court hearing for the submission of confidential sources of information supporting the authorities’ line of investigation. It could not be applied in such a manner as to put disproportionate difficulties in the way of police authorities in taking effective measures to counter organised terrorism.

Moreover, the legal framework under Schedule 8 to the 2000 Act, governing proceedings for warrants of further detention, had set out clear and detailed procedural rules enabling the applicants to know the nature of the allegations against them and, with legal representation, to have the opportunity to refute those allegations and to participate effectively in proceedings concerning their continued detention.

Furthermore, the applicants and their legal advisers had been given reasons for the withholding of certain information. The information to be withheld had been limited to the further inquiries to be conducted and had been submitted to a judge who, in closed session, had been able to ensure that no material had been unnecessarily withheld from the applicants and to determine, in their interests, whether there had been reasonable grounds for believing that their further detention had been necessary.

Indeed, even in the absence of express provision in the relevant law, the judge had had the power to appoint a special advocate if he considered such appointment necessary to secure the fairness of the proceedings. Significantly, the applicants had not requested the appointment of a special advocate.

Whole life sentence to be re-examined

A triple killer’s claim that his whole-life prison sentence breaches his human rights is to be re-examined by European judges. Arthur Hutchinson’s case will be considered again after it was referred to the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). Earlier this year a judgment from the Strasbourg court ruled that there… Continue Reading

Prisoner voting ban breaches human rights

The rights of more than 1,000 UK prisoners were breached when they were prevented from voting in elections, European judges have said. But the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) rejected the applicants’ claims for compensation and legal costs. The case before the ECHR concerned 1,015 prisoners who were behind bars throughout various elections between… Continue Reading

European Court Rules Whole Life Sentences Lawful

Triple killer Arthur Hutchinson, who murdered three members of the same family in Sheffield, has lost his challenge at the European Court of Human Rights against his whole-life prison sentence. The judgment is the latest development in the protracted legal wrangle over “life means life” terms. Hutchinson was jailed in 1984 for stabbing wealthy couple… Continue Reading

‘Cowardly judges’ say prisoners’ breach of human rights doesn’t deserve costs or compensation

In a decision said to be ‘cowardly’ European Judges have ruled that denying the vote to a group of prisoners was a breach of human rights, although no compensation or costs should be paid to them saying the ruling in their favour was enough. The group, who are prisoners in Scottish jails, argued the UK’s… Continue Reading

Notorious Abu Ghraib Prison Closed

Iraqi authorities have closed down a notorious prison west of Baghdad over security concerns, the justice minister said. Hassan al-Shimmari said that 2,400 inmates have been transferred from Abu Ghraib to other prisons in safer areas of the country. He said it was a precautionary measure because the Abu Ghraib facility is located in “a… Continue Reading

“Distasteful”: Ministers Plan To Sidestep Human Rights Ruling

Murderers and those convicted of other serious offences could be given sentences lasting hundreds of years to sidestep European regulations that ban whole-life terms, it is reported – which one critic called ‘distasteful’.. Ministers are considering introducing the lengthy sentences to get around a ruling by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), the Daily… Continue Reading

Tory Plans On Human Rights Shake Up

The Conservative Party will draft proposed new laws to curtail the impact of European human rights legislation on Britain in the coming year, Justice Secretary Chris Grayling has said. Pulling out of the European Convention on Human Rights altogether is still being considered by the party, Mr Grayling added. Other possibilities are also being reviewed… Continue Reading